The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonCasey McLean24%of decided measures13measures wonJack Bostock
Games played: 18 for Casey McLean, 14 for Jack Bostock. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Casey McLean |  Jack Bostock |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.61Better | 0.36 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.56 | 0.79Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.83Better | 0.79 |
| Points per Game | 2.4Better | 1.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.67Better | 0.36 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.89Better | 2.57 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.56 | 1.07Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.3 | 24.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 4.2 | 5.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 132.2 | 144.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.7 | 148.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.7Better | 46.4 |
| Runs per Game | 14.3 | 17.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.22Better | 8.36 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.70 | 8.38Better |
| Tackles per Game | 14.8 | 16.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 77.6 | 84.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.24 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 1.0Better |
| Games played | 18 | 14 |