2026 NRL player comparison

Cameron McInnesvsTrent Loiero

Sharks · Lock versus Storm · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Trent Loiero has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Trent Loiero leads by 56%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

4measures wonCameron McInnes56%of decided measures14measures wonTrent Loiero

Games played: 17 for Cameron McInnes, 21 for Trent Loiero. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoCameron McInnesStorm logoTrent Loiero
Tries per Game0.060.10Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.05Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.18Better0.05
Points per Game0.20.4Better
Line Breaks per Game0.12Better0.05
Tackle Breaks per Game1.121.43Better
Offloads per Game0.120.86Better
Possessions per Game17.919.6Better
Passes per Game8.19.0Better
Run Metres per Game75.985.1Better
Metres Gained per Game75.988.2Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game26.229.8Better
Runs per Game10.110.7Better
Metres per Run7.557.95Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.868.50Better
Tackles per Game32.236.1Better
Tackle Efficiency94.0Better91.5
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.04Better0.06
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Games played1721