2026 NRL player comparison

Cameron McInnesvsNat Butcher

Sharks · Lock versus Roosters · Lock

Compare another player

The verdict

Nat Butcher has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Nat Butcher leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonCameron McInnes18%of decided measures10measures wonNat Butcher

Games played: 17 for Cameron McInnes, 22 for Nat Butcher. Compared positions: Lock.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoCameron McInnesRoosters logoNat Butcher
Tries per Game0.06Better0.05
Try Assists per Game0.000.05Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.18Better0.05
Points per Game0.20.2
Line Breaks per Game0.12Better0.09
Tackle Breaks per Game1.12Better0.73
Offloads per Game0.120.27Better
Possessions per Game17.9Better15.1
Passes per Game8.1Better1.3
Run Metres per Game75.9117.9Better
Metres Gained per Game75.9118.3Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game26.242.2Better
Runs per Game10.113.5Better
Metres per Run7.558.70Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.868.14Better
Tackles per Game32.233.7Better
Tackle Efficiency94.0Better93.9
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.040.02Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Games played1722