The verdict
Jojo Fifita has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jojo Fifita leads by 62%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonBronson Xerri62%of decided measures17measures wonJojo Fifita
Games played: 19 for Bronson Xerri, 20 for Jojo Fifita. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.16 | 0.40Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.26Better | 0.20 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.37Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.21 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.42 | 2.55Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.21 | 0.75Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.2 | 16.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.5 | 4.8Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.5 | 108.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 100.4 | 110.6Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 36.1 | 40.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.1Better | 10.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.91 | 10.15Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.33 | 8.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 8.7 | 17.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 82.6 | 85.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.11Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 19 | 20 |