2026 NRL player comparison

Briton NikoravsZac Hosking

Sharks · Second Row versus Raiders · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Zac Hosking has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonBriton Nikora44%of decided measures13measures wonZac Hosking

Games played: 19 for Briton Nikora, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBriton NikoraRaiders logoZac Hosking
Tries per Game0.160.24Better
Try Assists per Game0.050.05
Line Break Assists per Game0.16Better0.05
Points per Game0.61.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.21Better0.19
Tackle Breaks per Game0.95Better0.86
Offloads per Game0.840.90Better
Possessions per Game12.113.1Better
Passes per Game1.9Better1.7
Run Metres per Game74.189.1Better
Metres Gained per Game75.389.1Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game25.531.3Better
Runs per Game9.310.9Better
Metres per Run8.008.17Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.79Better8.53
Tackles per Game30.833.2Better
Tackle Efficiency88.593.3Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.080.04Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.090.02Better
Games played1921