2026 NRL player comparison

Brian To'ovsWill Warbrick

Panthers · Wing versus Storm · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Brian To'o has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Brian To'o leads by 27%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonBrian To'o27%of decided measures8measures wonWill Warbrick

Games played: 22 for Brian To'o, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricPanthers logoBrian To'oStorm logoWill Warbrick
Tries per Game0.680.89Better
Try Assists per Game0.050.06Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.09Better0.00
Points per Game2.73.6Better
Line Breaks per Game1.05Better0.61
Tackle Breaks per Game5.14Better3.00
Offloads per Game0.320.78Better
Possessions per Game21.5Better19.7
Passes per Game1.8Better1.6
Run Metres per Game178.9Better137.9
Metres Gained per Game183.3Better137.9
Post-Contact Metres per Game67.6Better50.4
Runs per Game18.7Better14.7
Metres per Run9.55Better9.37
Metres per Hit-Up7.988.65Better
Tackles per Game5.8Better5.4
Tackle Efficiency75.378.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.270.20Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.05Better0.09
Kick Returns per Game1.6Better1.5
Kick Return Metres per Game19.7Better18.3
Bombs Caught per Game0.51.6Better
Games played2218