The verdict
Noah Martin has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Noah Martin leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonBrendan Piakura5%of decided measures10measures wonNoah Martin
Games played: 12 for Brendan Piakura, 11 for Noah Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Brendan Piakura |  Noah Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.17 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.17Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.7 | 1.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.25 | 2.18Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33Better | 0.18 |
| Possessions per Game | 10.5 | 10.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.2 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 80.6Better | 70.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 80.6Better | 70.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.0Better | 26.8 |
| Runs per Game | 10.2Better | 8.1 |
| Metres per Run | 7.93 | 8.65Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.02Better | 7.80 |
| Tackles per Game | 20.1 | 39.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.4 | 90.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 12 | 11 |