2026 NRL player comparison

Braydon TrindallvsStephen Crichton

Sharks · Five-Eighth versus Bulldogs · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Braydon Trindall has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Braydon Trindall leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonBraydon Trindall14%of decided measures9measures wonStephen Crichton

Games played: 21 for Braydon Trindall, 20 for Stephen Crichton. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBraydon TrindallBulldogs logoStephen Crichton
Tries per Game0.43Better0.35
Try Assists per Game1.24Better0.45
Line Break Assists per Game1.05Better0.55
Points per Game2.86.7Better
Line Breaks per Game0.290.45Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.621.80Better
Offloads per Game0.330.95Better
Possessions per Game50.4Better30.5
Passes per Game32.1Better16.0
Run Metres per Game34.689.3Better
Metres Gained per Game517.8Better259.9
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.533.5Better
Runs per Game4.88.7Better
Metres per Run7.2610.26Better
Metres per Hit-Up10.85
Tackles per Game13.5Better13.2
Tackle Efficiency84.5Better78.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.18
Conversion Accuracy66.773.7Better
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.04
Kicks per Game14.1Better4.8
Kick Metres per Game483.1Better170.6
Games played2120