2026 NRL player comparison

Braydon TrindallvsLuke Brooks

Sharks · Five-Eighth versus Sea Eagles · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Braydon Trindall has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Braydon Trindall leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonBraydon Trindall5%of decided measures9measures wonLuke Brooks

Games played: 21 for Braydon Trindall, 15 for Luke Brooks. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBraydon TrindallSea Eagles logoLuke Brooks
Tries per Game0.43Better0.13
Try Assists per Game1.24Better0.53
Line Break Assists per Game1.05Better0.80
Points per Game2.8Better0.5
Line Breaks per Game0.29Better0.20
Tackle Breaks per Game0.621.20Better
Offloads per Game0.330.53Better
Possessions per Game50.456.4Better
Passes per Game32.144.1Better
Run Metres per Game34.673.7Better
Metres Gained per Game517.8Better273.0
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.520.0Better
Runs per Game4.88.7Better
Metres per Run7.268.44Better
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game13.518.9Better
Tackle Efficiency84.5Better79.8
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.13Better0.22
Conversion Accuracy66.7
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Kicks per Game14.1Better5.7
Kick Metres per Game483.1Better199.3
Games played2115