2026 NRL player comparison

Braydon TrindallvsFletcher Sharpe

Sharks · Five-Eighth versus Knights · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Fletcher Sharpe has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

8measures wonBraydon Trindall16%of decided measures11measures wonFletcher Sharpe

Games played: 21 for Braydon Trindall, 22 for Fletcher Sharpe. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBraydon TrindallKnights logoFletcher Sharpe
Tries per Game0.430.55Better
Try Assists per Game1.24Better0.50
Line Break Assists per Game1.05Better0.73
Points per Game2.8Better2.2
Line Breaks per Game0.290.59Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.623.18Better
Offloads per Game0.330.68Better
Possessions per Game50.4Better40.9
Passes per Game32.1Better29.0
Run Metres per Game34.6105.6Better
Metres Gained per Game517.8Better140.4
Post-Contact Metres per Game6.535.6Better
Runs per Game4.810.5Better
Metres per Run7.2610.10Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.50
Tackles per Game13.517.5Better
Tackle Efficiency84.586.3Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.130.09Better
Conversion Accuracy66.7
Penalty Goal Accuracy100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Kicks per Game14.1Better1.3
Kick Metres per Game483.1Better34.8
Games played2122