The verdict
Braidon Burns has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonBraidon Burns52%of decided measures5measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Braidon Burns |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.75 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.06Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 3.0 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.90Better | 0.61 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 3.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.35Better | 0.78 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.6Better | 19.7 |
| Passes per Game | 2.1Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 173.9Better | 137.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 173.9Better | 137.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.9Better | 50.4 |
| Runs per Game | 19.1Better | 14.7 |
| Metres per Run | 9.13 | 9.37Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 8.65 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.7Better | 5.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.4Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 24.7Better | 18.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 20 | 18 |