The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonBraidon Burns14%of decided measures12measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase
Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.75 | 0.79Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.32Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.32Better |
| Points per Game | 3.0 | 3.2Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.90Better | 0.74 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 3.21 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.35Better | 1.21 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.6 | 21.6 |
| Passes per Game | 2.1 | 2.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 173.9Better | 157.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 173.9Better | 162.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.9 | 60.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 19.1Better | 16.4 |
| Metres per Run | 9.13 | 9.61Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 7.72 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.7Better | 4.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20 | 0.14Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06Better | 0.11 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.4 | 3.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 24.7 | 34.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4 | 1.3Better |
| Games played | 20 | 19 |