2026 NRL player comparison

Braidon BurnsvsMark Nawaqanitawase

Cowboys · Wing versus Roosters · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonBraidon Burns14%of decided measures12measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase

Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricCowboys logoBraidon BurnsRoosters logoMark Nawaqanitawase
Tries per Game0.750.79Better
Try Assists per Game0.050.32Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.200.32Better
Points per Game3.03.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.90Better0.74
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better3.21
Offloads per Game1.35Better1.21
Possessions per Game21.621.6
Passes per Game2.12.5Better
Run Metres per Game173.9Better157.8
Metres Gained per Game173.9Better162.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game58.960.8Better
Runs per Game19.1Better16.4
Metres per Run9.139.61Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.96Better7.72
Tackles per Game5.7Better4.6
Tackle Efficiency79.284.5Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.200.14Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.06Better0.11
Kick Returns per Game2.43.1Better
Kick Return Metres per Game24.734.9Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.41.3Better
Games played2019