The verdict
Lehi Hopoate has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Lehi Hopoate leads by 18%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonBraidon Burns18%of decided measures13measures wonLehi Hopoate
Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 23 for Lehi Hopoate. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Braidon Burns |  Lehi Hopoate |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.75 | 0.83Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.22Better |
| Points per Game | 3.0 | 3.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.90 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 2.78 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.35Better | 0.74 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.6 | 23.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.1 | 4.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 173.9Better | 160.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 173.9Better | 162.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.9Better | 51.5 |
| Runs per Game | 19.1Better | 16.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.13 | 9.48Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 7.98 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.7 | 6.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2Better | 70.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.4 | 2.7Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 24.7 | 27.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 20 | 23 |