The verdict
Braidon Burns has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 55%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonBraidon Burns55%of decided measures5measures wonEnari Tuala
Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 20 for Enari Tuala. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.75Better | 0.25 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.10Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.15 |
| Points per Game | 3.0Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.90Better | 0.65 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.95Better | 2.95 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.35Better | 0.40 |
| Possessions per Game | 21.6Better | 18.9 |
| Passes per Game | 2.1Better | 2.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 173.9Better | 139.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 173.9Better | 144.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 58.9Better | 47.3 |
| Runs per Game | 19.1Better | 15.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.13Better | 8.80 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 7.49 |
| Tackles per Game | 5.7 | 13.1Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 85.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.20 | 0.13Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 2.4Better | 1.0 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 24.7Better | 10.9 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.3 |
| Games played | 20 | 20 |