2026 NRL player comparison

Braidon BurnsvsDean Ieremia

Cowboys · Wing versus Titans · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Braidon Burns has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Braidon Burns leads by 73%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

19measures wonBraidon Burns73%of decided measures3measures wonDean Ieremia

Games played: 20 for Braidon Burns, 5 for Dean Ieremia. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricCowboys logoBraidon BurnsTitans logoDean Ieremia
Tries per Game0.75Better0.20
Try Assists per Game0.05Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Points per Game3.0Better0.8
Line Breaks per Game0.90Better0.20
Tackle Breaks per Game3.95Better1.20
Offloads per Game1.35Better0.00
Possessions per Game21.6Better18.6
Passes per Game2.1Better1.8
Run Metres per Game173.9Better131.8
Metres Gained per Game173.9Better131.8
Post-Contact Metres per Game58.9Better43.2
Runs per Game19.1Better15.8
Metres per Run9.13Better8.34
Metres per Hit-Up8.96Better7.98
Tackles per Game5.7Better4.0
Tackle Efficiency79.283.3Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.200.10Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.060.04Better
Kick Returns per Game2.4Better2.2
Kick Return Metres per Game24.7Better23.4
Bombs Caught per Game0.4Better0.2
Games played205