The verdict
Bradman Best has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Bradman Best leads by 10%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonBradman Best10%of decided measures9measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 14 for Bradman Best, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.29Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 1.00Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.14Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 1.1 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.21 | 0.52Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.36 | 3.19Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.00 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.1Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 4.4Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 133.4Better | 129.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 139.4Better | 132.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.0 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.8 | 13.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.44Better | 9.40 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.17 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 12.4 | 13.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 80.1Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.18Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.4 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 14 | 21 |