2026 NRL player comparison

Blake LawrievsMitchell Barnett

Dragons · Prop versus Warriors · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Mitchell Barnett has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 100%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

0measures wonBlake Lawrie100%of decided measures19measures wonMitchell Barnett

Games played: 18 for Blake Lawrie, 15 for Mitchell Barnett. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDragons logoBlake LawrieWarriors logoMitchell Barnett
Tries per Game0.060.07Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.20Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.13Better
Points per Game0.20.3Better
Line Breaks per Game0.060.07Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.171.87Better
Offloads per Game0.060.53Better
Possessions per Game5.919.5Better
Passes per Game0.32.7Better
Run Metres per Game47.6149.0Better
Metres Gained per Game47.6149.5Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game16.752.7Better
Runs per Game5.616.9Better
Metres per Run8.578.83Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.328.61Better
Tackles per Game13.527.3Better
Tackle Efficiency90.390.5Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.070.06Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Games played1815