The verdict
Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonBilly Smith14%of decided measures12measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase
Games played: 14 for Billy Smith, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Billy Smith | Mark Nawaqanitawase |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.86Better | 0.79 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.36Better | 0.32 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.21 | 0.32Better |
| Points per Game | 3.4Better | 3.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.21Better | 0.74 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.14 | 3.21Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.07 | 1.21Better |
| Possessions per Game | 23.5Better | 21.6 |
| Passes per Game | 5.1Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.7 | 157.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 149.7 | 162.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.9 | 60.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 17.2Better | 16.4 |
| Metres per Run | 8.70 | 9.61Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.59 | 7.72Better |
| Tackles per Game | 9.9Better | 4.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.1 | 84.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.11 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.6 | 3.1Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 13.9 | 34.9Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6 | 1.3Better |
| Games played | 14 | 19 |