The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonBilly Burns22%of decided measures11measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Billy Burns |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25Better | 0.24 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.04Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.96Better | 0.90 |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 13.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 72.2 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 75.8 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 27.8 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 8.3 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.71Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.48 | 8.53Better |
| Tackles per Game | 28.4 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 87.3 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 24 | 21 |