2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsJacob Laban

Sharks · Second Row versus Warriors · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonBilly Burns0%of decided measures9measures wonJacob Laban

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 24 for Jacob Laban. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsWarriors logoJacob Laban
Tries per Game0.250.33Better
Try Assists per Game0.080.13Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.040.04
Points per Game1.01.3Better
Line Breaks per Game0.330.46Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.042.21Better
Offloads per Game0.96Better0.50
Possessions per Game12.3Better11.4
Passes per Game3.4Better1.9
Run Metres per Game72.273.6Better
Metres Gained per Game75.8Better75.0
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.8Better26.5
Runs per Game8.38.7Better
Metres per Run8.71Better8.45
Metres per Hit-Up8.48Better7.81
Tackles per Game28.4Better27.9
Tackle Efficiency87.389.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.100.08Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.05Better0.08
Games played2424