2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsFrancis Manuleleua

Sharks · Second Row versus Knights · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Billy Burns has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Billy Burns leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonBilly Burns26%of decided measures7measures wonFrancis Manuleleua

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 18 for Francis Manuleleua. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsKnights logoFrancis Manuleleua
Tries per Game0.25Better0.11
Try Assists per Game0.080.33Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.040.17Better
Points per Game1.0Better0.4
Line Breaks per Game0.330.44Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.041.11Better
Offloads per Game0.96Better0.44
Possessions per Game12.3Better5.2
Passes per Game3.4Better0.9
Run Metres per Game72.2Better46.2
Metres Gained per Game75.8Better46.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.8Better20.3
Runs per Game8.3Better4.5
Metres per Run8.7110.27Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.4810.07Better
Tackles per Game28.4Better13.9
Tackle Efficiency87.3Better84.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.10Better0.14
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.01Better
Games played2418