2026 NRL player comparison

Billy BurnsvsEddie Ieremia-Toeava

Sharks · Second Row versus Warriors · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Billy Burns has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Billy Burns leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonBilly Burns33%of decided measures6measures wonEddie Ieremia-Toeava

Games played: 24 for Billy Burns, 17 for Eddie Ieremia-Toeava. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricSharks logoBilly BurnsWarriors logoEddie Ieremia-Toeava
Tries per Game0.25Better0.06
Try Assists per Game0.080.24Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.040.24Better
Points per Game1.0Better0.2
Line Breaks per Game0.33Better0.18
Tackle Breaks per Game1.04Better0.76
Offloads per Game0.96Better0.41
Possessions per Game12.3Better8.4
Passes per Game3.4Better1.1
Run Metres per Game72.2Better62.3
Metres Gained per Game75.8Better62.3
Post-Contact Metres per Game27.8Better22.5
Runs per Game8.3Better7.0
Metres per Run8.718.90Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.488.48
Tackles per Game28.4Better18.9
Tackle Efficiency87.391.2Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.100.05Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.050.02Better
Games played2417