2026 NRL player comparison

Ben HuntvsLuke Metcalf

Broncos · Halfback versus Warriors · Halfback

Compare another player

The verdict

Ben Hunt has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Ben Hunt leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonBen Hunt47%of decided measures5measures wonLuke Metcalf

Games played: 20 for Ben Hunt, 10 for Luke Metcalf. Compared positions: Halfback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricBroncos logoBen HuntWarriors logoLuke Metcalf
Tries per Game0.100.20Better
Try Assists per Game0.30Better0.10
Line Break Assists per Game0.40Better0.20
Points per Game0.42.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.100.10
Tackle Breaks per Game0.70Better0.50
Offloads per Game0.25Better0.00
Possessions per Game44.2Better13.5
Passes per Game37.3Better8.8
Run Metres per Game22.0Better19.3
Metres Gained per Game221.3Better113.1
Post-Contact Metres per Game5.0Better4.7
Runs per Game3.1Better2.1
Metres per Run7.109.19Better
Metres per Hit-Up
Tackles per Game20.0Better5.8
Tackle Efficiency84.986.6Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.120.10Better
Conversion Accuracy75.0
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.02
Kicks per Game5.0Better2.8
Kick Metres per Game199.3Better94.0
Games played2010