The verdict
Beau Fermor has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Beau Fermor leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonBeau Fermor47%of decided measures5measures wonIzack Tago
Games played: 23 for Beau Fermor, 23 for Izack Tago. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Beau Fermor |  Izack Tago |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.17Better | 0.13 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.04 | 0.13Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.22 |
| Points per Game | 0.7Better | 0.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.13 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.83Better | 1.48 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.74Better | 0.43 |
| Possessions per Game | 16.1Better | 8.8 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 112.9Better | 60.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 114.0Better | 62.3 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.0Better | 21.0 |
| Runs per Game | 13.9Better | 6.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.14 | 9.09Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.56 | 8.21Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 10.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 86.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.1Better |
| Games played | 23 | 23 |