2026 NRL player comparison

Ativalu LisativsKurt Capewell

Storm · Second Row versus Warriors · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Ativalu Lisati has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Ativalu Lisati leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonAtivalu Lisati47%of decided measures5measures wonKurt Capewell

Games played: 10 for Ativalu Lisati, 13 for Kurt Capewell. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricStorm logoAtivalu LisatiWarriors logoKurt Capewell
Tries per Game0.30Better0.15
Try Assists per Game0.000.23Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.20Better0.15
Points per Game1.2Better0.6
Line Breaks per Game0.100.23Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.20Better1.00
Offloads per Game0.400.62Better
Possessions per Game15.1Better13.0
Passes per Game1.93.0Better
Run Metres per Game106.0Better76.2
Metres Gained per Game108.3Better80.5
Post-Contact Metres per Game40.6Better29.2
Runs per Game12.8Better9.2
Metres per Run8.288.32Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.76Better8.67
Tackles per Game39.2Better29.8
Tackle Efficiency90.3Better86.6
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.06Better0.11
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.04
Games played1013