The verdict
Ativalu Lisati has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Ativalu Lisati leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAtivalu Lisati22%of decided measures7measures wonKai Pearce-Paul
Games played: 10 for Ativalu Lisati, 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ativalu Lisati |  Kai Pearce-Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.25Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.2 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10Better | 0.08 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20Better | 0.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40 | 2.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 15.1Better | 12.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 2.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.0Better | 68.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 108.3Better | 69.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.6Better | 24.6 |
| Runs per Game | 12.8Better | 8.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.28Better | 7.72 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76Better | 7.79 |
| Tackles per Game | 39.2Better | 35.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 91.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 10 | 12 |