The verdict
Ativalu Lisati has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Ativalu Lisati leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAtivalu Lisati22%of decided measures7measures wonJeremiah Nanai
Games played: 10 for Ativalu Lisati, 9 for Jeremiah Nanai. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ativalu Lisati |  Jeremiah Nanai |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.30 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.2 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.33Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.20 | 2.11Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40Better | 0.33 |
| Possessions per Game | 15.1Better | 10.9 |
| Passes per Game | 1.9Better | 0.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.0Better | 98.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 108.3Better | 98.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 40.6 | 42.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 12.8Better | 9.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.28 | 9.99Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76 | 10.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 39.2Better | 27.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3Better | 90.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 10 | 9 |