The verdict
Ata Mariota has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Ata Mariota leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonAta Mariota33%of decided measures6measures wonMat Croker
Games played: 24 for Ata Mariota, 24 for Mat Croker. Compared positions: Lock.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Ata Mariota |  Mat Croker |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08Better | 0.04 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.04Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.21Better |
| Points per Game | 0.3Better | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.46Better | 0.83 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.58Better | 0.46 |
| Possessions per Game | 11.3 | 17.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 8.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 89.7Better | 73.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 89.7Better | 73.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.4Better | 25.4 |
| Runs per Game | 10.1Better | 8.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.86Better | 8.24 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.71Better | 8.12 |
| Tackles per Game | 28.4 | 31.5Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.0Better | 89.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07Better | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 24 | 24 |