The verdict
Harry Grant has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Harry Grant leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonApisai Koroisau30%of decided measures13measures wonHarry Grant
Games played: 19 for Apisai Koroisau, 21 for Harry Grant. Compared positions: Hooker.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Apisai Koroisau |  Harry Grant |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.16 | 0.29Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.21 | 0.43Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.21 | 0.38Better |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 1.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.32 | 0.43Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.21 | 1.43Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.21 | 0.62Better |
| Possessions per Game | 119.2Better | 116.8 |
| Passes per Game | 113.1Better | 109.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 47.9 | 57.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 87.8 | 132.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 19.0Better | 10.0 |
| Runs per Game | 4.7 | 8.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.11Better | 7.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 2.00 | – |
| Tackles per Game | 41.0Better | 39.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.7 | 90.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 60.0Better | 50.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.01 |
| Dummy-Half Runs per Game | 2.8 | 7.0Better |
| Dummy-Half Metres per Game | 34.4 | 52.1Better |
| Games played | 19 | 21 |