The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonAngus Crichton5%of decided measures10measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 13 for Angus Crichton, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Angus Crichton |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.15 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08 | 0.19Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.00Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.08Better | 0.90 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.9Better | 13.1 |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 1.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 106.9Better | 89.1 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 106.9Better | 89.1 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.4Better | 31.3 |
| Runs per Game | 12.1Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.85Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.68 | 8.53Better |
| Tackles per Game | 30.8 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 13 | 21 |