2026 NRL player comparison

Angus CrichtonvsAtivalu Lisati

Roosters · Second Row versus Storm · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Ativalu Lisati has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Ativalu Lisati leads by 41%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonAngus Crichton41%of decided measures12measures wonAtivalu Lisati

Games played: 13 for Angus Crichton, 10 for Ativalu Lisati. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoAngus CrichtonStorm logoAtivalu Lisati
Tries per Game0.150.30Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.080.20Better
Points per Game0.61.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.080.10Better
Tackle Breaks per Game2.00Better1.20
Offloads per Game1.08Better0.40
Possessions per Game13.915.1Better
Passes per Game1.41.9Better
Run Metres per Game106.9Better106.0
Metres Gained per Game106.9108.3Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game47.4Better40.6
Runs per Game12.112.8Better
Metres per Run8.85Better8.28
Metres per Hit-Up7.688.76Better
Tackles per Game30.839.2Better
Tackle Efficiency90.390.3
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.080.06Better
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.040.02Better
Games played1310