The verdict
AJ Brimson has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, AJ Brimson leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonAJ Brimson24%of decided measures8measures wonRoger Tuivasa-Sheck
Games played: 22 for AJ Brimson, 10 for Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.27Better | 0.20 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.27 | 0.50Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.23 | 0.40Better |
| Points per Game | 1.1Better | 1.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.40 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.14Better | 2.10 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.30 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.1Better | 20.8 |
| Passes per Game | 14.0Better | 4.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.0 | 139.7Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 115.0 | 144.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.0 | 46.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 15.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.75Better | 9.13 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.39Better | 7.75 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.8Better | 6.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.9Better | 75.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.25 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.2Better |
| Games played | 22 | 10 |