The verdict
AJ Brimson has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, AJ Brimson leads by 5%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonAJ Brimson5%of decided measures10measures wonDeine Mariner
Games played: 22 for AJ Brimson, 18 for Deine Mariner. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  AJ Brimson |  Deine Mariner |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.27Better | 0.22 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.27Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.23Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 1.1Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45Better | 0.44 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.14 | 3.06Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.32Better | 0.17 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.1Better | 15.2 |
| Passes per Game | 14.0Better | 2.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.0 | 119.6Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 115.0 | 124.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 32.0 | 47.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 11.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.75 | 10.11Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.39 | 8.53Better |
| Tackles per Game | 15.8Better | 7.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.9Better | 82.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13 | 0.12Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 1.1Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.4Better |
| Games played | 22 | 18 |