The verdict
Tyson Frizell has the edge
Across 15 rate and efficiency measures, Tyson Frizell leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonAdam Elliott47%of decided measures11measures wonTyson Frizell
Games played: 9 for Adam Elliott, 21 for Tyson Frizell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Adam Elliott |  Tyson Frizell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.11Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.44 | 0.76Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.11 | 0.81Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.7Better | 11.2 |
| Passes per Game | 8.9Better | 2.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 39.9 | 80.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 39.9 | 81.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 15.0 | 31.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.1 | 8.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.80 | 9.04Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.32 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.6 | 24.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 88.8 | 93.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 9 | 21 |