The verdict
Kai Pearce-Paul has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Kai Pearce-Paul leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonAdam Elliott37%of decided measures13measures wonKai Pearce-Paul
Games played: 9 for Adam Elliott, 12 for Kai Pearce-Paul. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Adam Elliott |  Kai Pearce-Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.11 | 0.33Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.25Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.11 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 0.4 | 1.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.44 | 0.83Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.11 | 2.33Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.7Better | 12.2 |
| Passes per Game | 8.9Better | 2.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 39.9 | 68.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 39.9 | 69.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 15.0 | 24.6Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.1 | 8.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 7.80Better | 7.72 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.32Better | 7.79 |
| Tackles per Game | 17.6 | 35.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 88.8 | 91.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 9 | 12 |