2026 NRL player comparison

Adam ElliottvsBilly Burns

Rabbitohs · Second Row versus Sharks · Second Row

Compare another player

The verdict

Billy Burns has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Billy Burns leads by 37%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

6measures wonAdam Elliott37%of decided measures13measures wonBilly Burns

Games played: 9 for Adam Elliott, 24 for Billy Burns. Compared positions: Second Row.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRabbitohs logoAdam ElliottSharks logoBilly Burns
Tries per Game0.110.25Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.08Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.11Better0.04
Points per Game0.41.0Better
Line Breaks per Game0.000.33Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.441.04Better
Offloads per Game0.110.96Better
Possessions per Game14.7Better12.3
Passes per Game8.9Better3.4
Run Metres per Game39.972.2Better
Metres Gained per Game39.975.8Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game15.027.8Better
Runs per Game5.18.3Better
Metres per Run7.808.71Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.328.48Better
Tackles per Game17.628.4Better
Tackle Efficiency88.8Better87.3
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.05Better0.10
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.05
Games played924